- Recommendation ID
- IPG674
- Question
Evidence on the safety and efficacy of artificial iris implant insertion for acquired aniridia is limited in quantity and quality. Therefore, this procedure should only be used with special arrangements for clinical governance, consent, and audit or research. Find out what special arrangements mean on the NICE website.
- Any explanatory notes
(if applicable) 1.2Clinicians wishing to do artificial iris implant insertion for acquired aniridia should:
-
Inform the clinical governance leads in their NHS trusts.
-
Give patients clear information to support shared decision making, including NICE's information for the public.
-
Ensure that patients understand the procedure's safety and efficacy, as well as any uncertainties about these.
-
Audit and review clinical outcomes of all patients having the procedure. NICE has identified relevant audit criteria and developed an audit tool (which is for use at local discretion).
1.3The procedure should only be done by ophthalmic surgeons with appropriate experience and training.
1.4Research could include the use of observational data from cohort studies or high-quality case series. Studies should report details of patient selection and the type of implant used. Outcomes should include quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes.
1.5NICE may update the guidance on publication of further evidence.
-
Source guidance details
- Comes from guidance
- Artificial iris insertion for acquired aniridia
- Number
- IPG674
- Date issued
- July 2020
Other details
Is this a recommendation for the use of a technology only in the context of research? | Yes |
Is it a recommendation that suggests collection of data or the establishment of a register? | No |
Last Reviewed | 01/07/2020 |