Search results

Skip to results

Area of interest

Area of interest

Type

Type

Status

Status

Last updated

Last updated

Guidance programme

Advice programme

Showing 5536 to 5550 of 7682 results

  1. Evaluation frameworks and logic models:- Which evaluation frameworks and logic models can be used to evaluate the impact of community engagement on health and wellbeing?

    Recommendation ID NG44/2 Question Evaluation frameworks and logic models:- Which evaluation frameworks and logic models can be used to

    Research recommendation
    Published
    6 April 2016

  2. Evaluation of extensively used interventions:- Evaluate currently unevaluated but extensively used interventions for attachment difficulties.

    Recommendation ID NG26/3 Question Evaluation of extensively used interventions:- Evaluate currently unevaluated but extensively used interventions

    Research recommendation
    Published
    11 December 2015

  3. Evidence is adequate on the short-term safety and efficacy of personalised external aortic root support (PEARS) using mesh to prevent aortic root expansion and aortic dissection in people with Marfan syndrome. Evidence on long-term outcomes is limited in quantity and quality. Therefore, this procedure should only be used with special arrangements for clinical governance, consent and audit or research. Find out what special arrangements mean on the NICE interventional procedures guidance page. Further research should report details of patient selection, including aortic diameter, and long-term outcomes, including evidence of disease progression, such as dilation and dissection of the aortic root.

    Recommendation ID IPG724/01 Question Evidence is adequate on the short-term safety and efficacy of personalised external aortic root support

    Research recommendation
    Published
    31 May 2022

  4. Evidence on the efficacy and safety of neurostimulation of lumbar muscles for refractory non-specific chronic low back pain is limited in quantity and quality. Therefore, this procedure should only be used with special arrangements for clinical governance, consent, and audit or research. Find out what special arrangements mean on the NICE interventional procedures guidance page.

    Recommendation ID IPG739/01 Question Evidence on the efficacy and safety of neurostimulation of lumbar muscles for refractory non-specific

    Research recommendation
    Published
    30 September 2022

  5. Evidence on the efficacy of bioresorbable stent implantation to treat coronary artery disease is inadequate. Evidence on its safety has shown an increased risk of serious complications in the longer term. This includes an increased risk of myocardial infarction and death with some types of bioresorbable stents. Therefore, this procedure should only be used in the context of research. Find out what only in research means on the NICE interventional procedures guidance page.

    Recommendation ID IPG732/01 Question Evidence on the efficacy of bioresorbable stent implantation to treat coronary artery disease is inadequate

    Research recommendation
    Published
    7 September 2022

  6. Evidence on the efficacy of focal resurfacing implants to treat articular cartilage damage in the knee is limited in quality and quantity. Short-term evidence shows no major safety concerns, but long-term evidence on safety is limited in quality and quantity. Therefore, this procedure should only be used with special arrangements for clinical governance, consent, and audit or research. Find out what special arrangements mean on the NICE interventional procedures guidance page.

    Recommendation ID IPG734/01 Question Evidence on the efficacy of focal resurfacing implants to treat articular cartilage damage in the

    Research recommendation
    Published
    7 September 2022

  7. Evidence on the progression of X-linked hypophosphataemia (XLH) over time and the long-term benefits of burosumab would also be valuable.

    Recommendation ID HST8/3 Question Evidence on the progression of X-linked hypophosphataemia (XLH) over time and the long-term benefits

    Research recommendation
    Published
    22 March 2019

  8. Evidence on the safety and efficacy of aortic remodelling hybrid stent insertion during surgical repair of an acute type A aortic dissection is limited in quantity and quality. Therefore, this procedure should only be used with special arrangements for clinical governance, consent, and audit or research. Find out what special arrangements mean on the NICE interventional procedures guidance page.

    Recommendation ID IPG733/01 Question Evidence on the safety and efficacy of aortic remodelling hybrid stent insertion during surgical repair

    Research recommendation
    Published
    7 September 2022

  9. Evidence on the safety and efficacy of biodegradable spacer insertion to reduce rectal toxicity during radiotherapy for prostate cancer is limited in quality. Therefore, this procedure should only be used with special arrangements for clinical governance, consent, and audit or research. Find out what special arrangements mean on the NICE interventional procedures guidance page.

    Recommendation ID IPG752/01 Question Evidence on the safety and efficacy of biodegradable spacer insertion to reduce rectal toxicity during

    Research recommendation
    Published
    9 March 2023

  10. Evidence on the safety and efficacy of daytime intraoral neuromuscular electrical tongue stimulation using a removable device for obstructive sleep apnoea is inadequate in quality and quantity. So, this procedure should be used only in research. Find out what only in research means on the NICE interventional procedures guidance page.

    Recommendation ID IPG760/1 Question Evidence on the safety and efficacy of daytime intraoral neuromuscular electrical tongue stimulation

    Research recommendation
    Published
    5 May 2023

  11. Evidence on the safety and efficacy of endobronchial nerve ablation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is inadequate in quantity. Therefore, this procedure should only be used in the context of research. Find out what only in research means on the NICE interventional procedures guidance page. Further research should be randomised controlled trials comparing the procedure with sham treatment. It should report details of patient selection, and short and long-term functional outcomes including lung functional outcomes, quality of life and patient-reported outcomes, incidence of exacerbations and hospital admissions, and all adverse events.

    Recommendation ID IPG174/01 Question Evidence on the safety and efficacy of endobronchial nerve ablation for chronic obstructive pulmonary

    Research recommendation
    Published
    7 January 2022

  12. Evidence on the safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) for biliary obstruction caused by distal malignant disease is adequate to support using this procedure. This is provided that standard arrangements are in place for clinical governance, consent and audit. Find out what standard arrangements mean on the NICE interventional procedures guidance page.

    Recommendation ID IPG761/1 Question Evidence on the safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) for biliary

    Research recommendation
    Published
    5 May 2023

  13. Evidence on the safety and efficacy of inducing and maintaining normothermia using temperature modulation devices to improve outcomes after stroke or subarachnoid haemorrhage is inadequate in quality and quantity. Therefore, this procedure should only be used in the context of research. Find out what only in research means on the NICE interventional procedures guidance page.

    Recommendation ID IPG701/1 Question Evidence on the safety and efficacy of inducing and maintaining normothermia using temperature modulation

    Research recommendation
    Published
    13 August 2021

  14. Evidence on the safety and efficacy of intramedullary distraction for lower limb lengthening is limited in quantity and quality. Therefore, this procedure should only be used with special arrangements for clinical governance, consent, and audit or research. Find out what special arrangements mean on the NICE interventional procedures guidance page. This guidance is not intended to cover this procedure for bilateral lower limb lengthening for people with short stature.

    Recommendation ID IPG718/01 Question Evidence on the safety and efficacy of intramedullary distraction for lower limb lengthening is limited

    Research recommendation
    Published
    8 April 2022

  15. Evidence on the safety and efficacy of intramedullary distraction for upper limb lengthening is inadequate in quantity and quality. But because this is a rare condition with limited alternative treatments, the procedure can be considered as long as special arrangements for clinical governance, consent, and audit or research are in place. Find out what special arrangements mean on the NICE interventional procedures guidance page. Further research, which could be registry data, should report details of patient  selection, device selection, technique used, procedural outcomes, long-term  outcomes including quality of life, the need for repeat interventions or surgery and complication rates.

    Recommendation ID IPG722/01 Question Evidence on the safety and efficacy of intramedullary distraction for upper limb lengthening is inadequate

    Research recommendation
    Published
    11 May 2022