Search results

Skip to results

Area of interest

Area of interest

Type

Type

Status

Status

Last updated

Last updated

Guidance programme

Advice programme

Showing 5641 to 5655 of 7682 results

  1. For people with severe and symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation, evidence on the efficacy of transcatheter tricuspid valve annuloplasty is limited in quantity and quality. Evidence on its safety shows there are serious but well-recognised complications. Therefore, for these people, this procedure should only be used with special arrangements for clinical governance, consent, and audit or research. Find out what special arrangements mean on the NICE interventional procedures guidance page.

    Recommendation ID IPG730/01 Question For people with severe and symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation, evidence on the efficacy of transcatheter

    Research recommendation
    Published
    4 August 2022

  2. For people with severe and symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation, evidence on the efficacy of transcatheter tricuspid valve leaflet repair is limited in quantity and quality. Evidence on its safety shows there are serious but well-recognised complications. Therefore, for these people, this procedure should only be used with special arrangements for clinical governance, consent, and audit or research. Find out what special arrangements mean on the NICE interventional procedures guidance page.

    Recommendation ID IPG731/01 Question For people with severe and symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation, evidence on the efficacy of transcatheter

    Research recommendation
    Published
    5 August 2022

  3. Active surveillance compared with surgery: For people with stage 1 differentiated thyroid cancer, what is the clinical and cost effectiveness of active surveillance compared with surgery?

    Recommendation ID NG230/03 Question Active surveillance compared with surgery: For people with stage 1 differentiated thyroid cancer, what

    Research recommendation
    Published
    6 January 2023

  4. FRAX and QFracture in adults receiving bone protective therapy:- What is the utility of FRAX and QFracture in adults receiving bone protective therapy?

    Recommendation ID CG146/2 Question FRAX and QFracture in adults receiving bone protective therapy:- What is the utility of FRAX and QFracture

    Research recommendation
    Published
    9 June 2015

  5. FRAX and QFracture in adults with secondary causes of osteoporosis:- What is the utility of FRAX and QFracture in detecting risk of fragility fracture in adults with secondary causes of osteoporosis?

    Recommendation ID CG146/3 Question FRAX and QFracture in adults with secondary causes of osteoporosis:- What is the utility of FRAX and

    Research recommendation
    Published
    9 June 2015

  6. Undisplaced intracapsular hip fractures: For people with undisplaced (or non-displaced) intracapsular hip fracture, what features should be used to characterise the injury and what are the optimal clinical and cost-effective management strategies?

    Recommendation ID CG124/03 Question Undisplaced intracapsular hip fractures: For people with undisplaced (or non-displaced) intracapsular

    Research recommendation
    Published
    3 February 2023

  7. What are the benefits of planned, regular community-based reviews compared with as-required review of non-cancer patients approaching the end of their life?

    Recommendation ID NG142/3 Question What are the benefits of planned, regular community-based reviews compared with as-required review of

    Research recommendation
    Published
    18 November 2019

  8. For people with unfavourable aneurysm morphology needing an endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) as a primary procedure, or for people with an existing EVAR who need a secondary procedure, evidence on the safety of using endoanchoring systems is adequate. Evidence on efficacy is limited in quantity and quality. Therefore, for these people, this procedure should only be used with special arrangements for clinical governance, consent, and audit or research. Find out what special arrangements mean on the NICE interventional procedures guidance page.

    Recommendation ID IPG725/01 Question For people with unfavourable aneurysm morphology needing an endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR)

    Research recommendation
    Published
    1 June 2022

  9. Frequency of monitoring: For adults, children and young people with CKD, what is the optimal monitoring frequency for albumin:creatinine ratio?

    Recommendation ID NG203/9 Question Frequency of monitoring: For adults, children and young people with CKD, what is the optimal monitoring

    Research recommendation
    Published
    30 September 2021

  10. For which service users who are moderately and severely dependent on alcohol is an assertive community treatment model a clinically and cost-effective intervention compared with standard care?

    Recommendation ID CG115/4 Question For which service users who are moderately and severely dependent on alcohol is an assertive community

    Research recommendation
    Published
    9 June 2015

  11. Frequency of monitoring:- How frequently should children be measured to identify faltering growth?

    Recommendation ID NG75/4 Question Frequency of monitoring:- How frequently should children be measured to identify faltering growth?

    Research recommendation
    Published
    15 October 2018

  12. FRAX and QFracture in adults living in residential care:- What is the utility of FRAX and QFracture in detecting risk of fragility fracture in adults living in residential care?

    Recommendation ID CG146/5 Question FRAX and QFracture in adults living in residential care:- What is the utility of FRAX and QFracture

    Research recommendation
    Published
    9 June 2015

  13. Frequency of monitoring:- What is the effectiveness of more frequent monitoring compared with monitoring at 12 months after diagnosis in people with newly diagnosed coeliac disease?

    Recommendation ID NG20/5 Question Frequency of monitoring:- What is the effectiveness of more frequent monitoring compared with monitoring

    Research recommendation
    Published
    13 October 2015

  14. Frequency of monitoring:- What is the long-term cost effectiveness, in terms of patient-relevant outcomes including bestcorrected visual acuity and quality of life, of different review frequencies/strategies for people at risk of progression to late AMD (wet active)?

    Recommendation ID NG82/4 Question Frequency of monitoring:- What is the long-term cost effectiveness, in terms of patient-relevant outcomes

    Research recommendation
    Published
    13 November 2018

  15. Frequency of review: What is the most clinical and cost-effective frequency of review for children and young people with CKD?

    Recommendation ID NG203/12 Question Frequency of review: What is the most clinical and cost-effective frequency of review for children

    Research recommendation
    Published
    30 September 2021