How are you taking part in this consultation?

You will not be able to change how you comment later.

You must be signed in to answer questions

  • Question on Consultation

    • Has all of the relevant evidence been taken into account?

  • Question on Consultation

    • Are the summaries of clinical and and cost effectiveness reasonable interpretations of the evidence?

  • Question on Consultation

    • Are the recommendations sound and a suitable basis for guidance to the NHS?

  • Question on Consultation

    • Are there any equality issues that need special consideration and are not covered in the medical technology consultation document?

  • Question on Consultation

    • Have we considered all of the evidence for Prontosan in acute wounds?
The content on this page is not current guidance and is only for the purposes of the consultation process.

Prontosan for acute and chronic wounds

Closed for comments This consultation ended on at   Request commenting lead permission

5 Committee members and NICE project team

Committee members

This topic was considered by NICE's medical technology advisory committee, which is a standing advisory committee of NICE.

Committee members are asked to declare any interests in the technology to be appraised. If it is considered there is a conflict of interest, the member is excluded from participating further in that evaluation.

The minutes of the medical technology advisory committee, which include the names of the members who attended and their declarations of interests, are posted on the NICE website.

NICE project team

Each medical technologies guidance topic is assigned to a team consisting of 1 or more technical analysts (who act as technical leads for the topic), a technical adviser and a project manager.

Lirije Hyseni
Health technology assessment analyst

Juliet Kenny and Kimberley Carter
Health technology assessment advisers

Victoria Fitton
Project manager

ISBN: [to be added at publication]