How are you taking part in this consultation?

You will not be able to change how you comment later.

You must be signed in to answer questions

    The content on this page is not current guidance and is only for the purposes of the consultation process.

    Summary of key evidence on percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of peripheral neuroma for chronic pain

    Study 1 Cazzato R (2016)

    Study details

    Study type

    Case series

    Country

    France

    Recruitment period

    2011 to 2015

    Study population and number

    n=20 (24 neuromas)

    Patients with Morton's neuroma

    Age and sex

    Mean age 50.3 years; 75% (15/20) female

    Patient selection criteria

    Patients were included if they presented with typical clinical features (forefoot pain exacerbated by walking and relieved by rest and shoe removal); typical ultrasound and MRI findings; failure of conservative treatments (orthotic assessment, physical therapy) and ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection; chose not to have surgery.

    Patients were excluded if they had contraindications to MRI (such as a pacemaker or claustrophobia).

    Technique

    All procedures were done under local anaesthesia on an outpatient basis. Patients were positioned in a large-bore 1.5 T MRI unit. After a small skin incision, a 2-cm active tip cryoprobe (Ice-Seed, Galil Medical Inc., US) was advanced into the centre of the lesion using an inter-metatarsal approach. A single therapeutic freezing cycle lasting 150 seconds was done, and ice-ball growth was monitored throughout the procedure. The cryoprobe was repositioned (with an additional 90-second freezing cycle for each repositioning) if the target lesion was not completely covered by the ice-ball. Finally, a short thawing cycle was applied to enable cryoprobe withdrawal.

    Follow up

    Mean 19.7 months

    Conflict of interest/source of funding

    3 authors are proctors for Galil Medical Inc.

    Analysis

    Follow up issues: Patients were followed up by telephone survey. Follow-up data was only available for 75% (18/24) of neuromas. The remaining patients could not be contacted.

    Study design issues: Single centre, retrospective case series. Clinical outcomes (patient satisfaction and local pain scores) were evaluated using retrospective chart review and results of the telephone survey. Technical success was defined as an accurate cryoprobe placement in the centre of the lesion, homogeneous ice-ball growth with full lesion coverage, and limited involvement of the adjacent metatarsal bones and plantar fat pad. Complications were classified as minor or major according to the Society of Interventional Radiology grading system.

    Study population issues: The mean Morton's neuroma size was 12.7 mm (range 8 to 34 mm). Four patients had bilateral lesions. The most common location of the Morton's neuroma was the third web-space (92% [22/24]).

    Key efficacy findings

    Number of patients analysed: 20 (24 Morton's neuromas)

    • Technical success=100%

    • Patient satisfaction on per-lesion basis

      • Completely satisfied=77.7% (14/18)

      • Satisfied with minor reservations=16.6% (3/18)

      • Satisfied with major reservations=5.7% (1/18)

      • Dissatisfied=0% (0/18)

    • Mean pain score at last follow up (visual analogue scale [VAS] 0 to 10) = 3.0

    Key safety findings

    There was 1 minor complication: local cellulitis around the cryoprobe entry point. This fully resolved after 5 days of oral antibiotic therapy.

    There were no cases of 'stump neuroma'.

    Study 2 Friedman T (2012)

    Study details

    Study type

    Case series

    Country

    US

    Recruitment period

    2007 to 2011

    Study population and number

    n=20 (5 Morton's neuroma, 12 stump neuromas secondary to surgery or trauma, 3 peripheral neuritis with no visible lesion)

    Patients with painful neuromas or peripheral neuritis

    Age and sex

    Mean age 49 years (range 18 to 79); 75% (15/20) female

    Patient selection criteria

    All patients who had sonographically guided cryoneurolysis for painful neuromas or peripheral neuritis were included. The patients were referred for pain that was refractory to multiple conservative measures, including physiotherapy and steroid injections.

    All patients had at least moderate pain improvement after anaesthetic injection.

    Technique

    Cryotherapy machine: Frigitronics CE 2000 (Cooper Surgical Inc., US).

    At their request, 1 patient had spinal anaesthesia and 1 had intravenous sedation. An ultrasound scan was used to identify the target nerve or neuroma and to plan the trajectory of the cryoprobe. A proximal nerve block was done in most patients at the start of the procedure to provide regional anaesthesia for the duration of the procedure and short-term periprocedural pain relief. A small amount of 1% lidocaine was used as a local anaesthetic. A trochar tip cryoprobe was advanced under sonographic visualisation until just proximal to the nerve or into the neuroma. A sheath was left around the cryoprobe to protect the skin and nontarget tissues. When there was no visible lesion, an electric stimulator was used to confirm correct positioning. Once in position, the cryoprobe was activated and 2 to 4 ice balls were created, until the lesion was surrounded. The probe was repositioned slightly to create contiguous ice balls.

    Follow up

    Morton's neuroma: mean follow up=14 weeks (range 6 weeks to 14 months)

    Stump neuromas: mean follow up=6.3 months (range 2 weeks to 38 months)

    Peripheral neuritis: mean follow up=5.6 months (range 4 to 8 months)

    Conflict of interest/source of funding

    Not reported

    Analysis

    Follow up issues: Patients were scheduled for routine clinical follow up at 4 to 6 weeks after the procedure. After this time, follow up was variable.

    Study design issues: Retrospective case series. The same anaesthesiologist who initially assessed the patients and helped administer treatment did the follow-up. A VAS pain score was used and categorised into mild (1 to 3), moderate (3 to 6) or severe (7 to 10). When a VAS score was unavailable, the patient's own descriptors of pain were used to categorise the pain as mild, moderate, or severe. Response to treatment was categorised as no, mild, moderate, and marked pain relief.

    Study population issues: patients with different indications were included.

    Other issues: The authors noted that only the superficial margin of the ice ball was evident on imaging because of dense posterior acoustic shadowing.

    Key efficacy findings

    Number of patients analysed: 20

    Clinical outcome in patients with Morton's neuroma

    Patient

    Pain before treatment

    Treatment response

    Duration of follow up

    1

    Severe

    Marked

    6 weeks

    2

    Severe

    Marked

    14 months of pain relief

    3

    Moderate

    Moderate

    4 weeks

    4

    Moderate

    Marked

    10 weeks

    5 (both feet)

    Moderate

    None

    4 weeks

    Clinical outcome in patients with lesions secondary to trauma or surgery

    Patient

    Pain before treatment

    Treatment response

    Duration of follow up

    1 (stump neuroma)

    Severe

    None

    2 weeks

    2 (plantar nerve scar)

    Moderate

    Mild

    7 weeks

    3 (stump neuroma)

    Moderate

    Marked

    17 weeks

    4 (sural nerve scar)

    Moderate

    Marked

    6 months of relief, returned for repeat treatment

    5 (plantar nerve scar)

    Moderate

    Moderate

    6 weeks

    6 (sural nerve scar)

    Moderate

    Moderate

    Moderate relief at 3 weeks, no relief at 4 months

    7 (plantar nerve scar)

    Moderate

    Marked

    8 months of relief, returned for repeat treatment

    8 (stump neuroma)

    Moderate

    None

    1 month

    9 (saphenous neuroma)

    Severe

    Marked

    38 months of relief, returned for repeat treatment

    10 (plantar nerve scar)

    Severe

    None

    3 weeks

    11 (stump neuroma)

    Moderate

    Marked

    6 months of relief, returned for repeat treatment

    12 (plantar nerve scar)

    Severe

    Marked

    11 weeks

    Clinical outcome in patients with no visible lesion

    Patient

    Pain before treatment

    Treatment response

    Duration of follow up

    1 (left medial nerve)

    Moderate

    Marked

    5 months of relief, returned for repeat treatment

    2 (Baxter nerve neuritis)

    Severe

    None

    4 months

    3 (Medial plantar nerve neuritis)

    Moderate

    Marked

    8 months of relief, returned for repeat treatment

    • Overall, 75% (15/20) of patients had a positive response to treatment and 5 patients had no pain relief (including 1 who had both feet treated).

    • Of those with a positive response, 11 patients had marked or total pain relief, 3 had moderate relief and 1 had mild relief.

    • Of the 5 patients who had no pain relief, 3 had further surgical procedures. No information was available for the other 2 patients.

    Key safety findings

    The only adverse event was minor bleeding at the puncture site. There were no cases of infection, thrombosis or skin necrosis.

    Study 3 von Falck C (2022)

    Study details

    Study type

    Case series

    Country

    Germany

    Recruitment period

    2018 to 2020

    Study population and number

    n=7 (8 neuromas)

    Patients with a symptomatic stump neuroma after limb amputation

    Age and sex

    Mean age 42 years (range 25 to 55 years); 43% (3/7) female

    Patient selection criteria

    Inclusion criteria: patient aged 18 years or over, adequate coagulation status, on imaging recognisable painful stump neuroma and decrease of pain after probatory perineural infiltration. Prior to ablation, all patients had typical neuropathic pain in the stump, restricting them in their daily living activities. Additional complaints were local cramps, phantom pain and an inability or limitation in wearing their limb prosthesis.

    Technique

    Cryoablation was done as an inpatient procedure under analgosedation and ultrasound guidance (Visual Ice System, Galil Medical Inc., US). A single cryoprobe (IceSphere or IceSeed) was advanced to the previously identified neuroma and ablation started (2 cycles of 6 minutes freezing separated by a 4-minute thaw cycle). The ablation zone and surrounding structures were continuously monitored with ultrasound. Care was taken that the resulting ice ball covered the whole neuroma without extending less than 0.5 cm to the skin surface. In addition, skin was protected with warm gel cushions. Patients were discharged the next morning, after follow-up ultrasound.

    Follow up

    Mean 27 months (range 6.8 to 40 months)

    Conflict of interest/source of funding

    None

    Analysis

    Follow up issues: Outpatient clinical follow-up was scheduled 6 weeks after the ablation. No losses to follow up were described.

    Study design issues: Retrospective observational study of prospectively collected data. Pain intensity before and after cryoablation was evaluated using a VAS (0 to 10). At final follow-up, patients were asked how satisfied they were with the cryoablation treatment (scale 0 to 100 where 0 is not satisfied at all and 100 is absolutely satisfied) and whether they would be willing to have the treatment again, if needed.

    Study population issues: Mean duration of pain before treatment was 8.4 months (range 2 to 24 months). The mean time interval between amputation and cryoablation was 100 months (range 11 to 336 months). Of the 7 patients, 2 had upper leg amputations and 5 had lower leg amputations.

    Key efficacy findings

    Number of patients analysed: 7 (8 neuromas, 9 cryoablation procedures)

    • Technical success=100%

    • Mean pain score (VAS, 0 to 10)

      • Before treatment=8.3 (range 5 to 10)

      • 1 day after treatment=4 (range 1 to 7); p=0.008 compared with baseline

      • 1 week after treatment=2.1 (range 0 to 6); p=004 compared with baseline

      • At last follow up=3 (range 0 to 7); p=0.004 compared with baseline

    • Mean satisfaction with treatment at last follow up=69 (range 10 to 100)

    • Willing to have repeat treatment if needed=85.7% (6/7) of patients

    The single patient that was not satisfied with treatment outcome (satisfaction score 10/100) had a 30% reduction of pain after cryoablation and indicated that he would not be willing to have reablation.

    There was no correlation of pain decrease with patient age, duration of pain before ablation or time interval between amputation and ablation.

    Key safety findings

    There were no major complications.

    In 1 patient, local redness of the skin was visible 1 day after ablation, which resolved spontaneously without any specific treatment.

    Study 4 Prologo JD (2017)

    Study details

    Study type

    Case series

    Country

    US

    Recruitment period

    2015 to 2016

    Study population and number

    n=21 (13 with a neuroma)

    Patients with refractory phantom limb pain

    Age and sex

    Mean 56.9 years (range 34 to 91 years); 57% (12/21) female

    Patient selection criteria

    All patients reported phantom pains or unwanted sensations related to a previously amputated upper or lower limb that were refractory to conventional treatment for at least 6 months. To have cryoablation, each patient was required to have documented symptomatic relief from an image-guided perineural injection of bupivacaine and betamethasone.

    Exclusion criteria: active infection, underlying congenital segmentation or other spinal anomalies that result in differential nerve root pressures, severe spinal stenosis, pregnant or planning to become pregnant, immunosuppression, history or laboratory results indicative of any significant cardiac, endocrine, hematologic, hepatic, immunologic, infectious, metabolic, urologic, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, dermatologic, psychiatric, renal, neoplastic, or other disorder that in the opinion of the principal investigator would preclude safe performance of cryoablation, uncorrectable coagulopathies, concurrent participation in another investigational trial involving systemic administration of agents or within the previous 30 days, previous surgical intervention, after amputation, that may have altered the target nerve.

    Technique

    A 2-step method was used, with a diagnostic nerve block injection followed by cryoablation that occurred on separate occasions. For the nerve block, a 22-gauge spinal needle was advanced under CT or ultrasound guidance to the target nerve or neuroma. Needle position was confirmed with fluoroscopic CT.

    All ablation procedures were done under conscious sedation. Using technique and targeting analogous to the diagnostic injections, an Ice-Sphere cryoablation needle (Galil Medical Inc., US) was advanced under imaging guidance to the previously identified nerve or neuroma. When position was confirmed, the probe temperature was decreased to −40°C over 10 minutes using the Galil Visual-ICE system. Images were obtained and reviewed 8 minutes into the freeze. A passive thaw cycle was then done for 5 minutes, followed by a second 10-minute freeze and subsequent final 5-minute passive thaw.

    Follow up

    Mean 194 days

    Conflict of interest/source of funding

    None

    Analysis

    Follow up issues: Patients were routinely followed up 7 and 45 days after the procedure. A final, long-term follow-up assessment was done after the 45-day visit. One patient died during the period between visit 3 and the long-term follow-up assessment and was considered lost to follow-up.

    Study design issues: Prospective single-arm pilot study. The main aim was to derive parameters to design a larger, randomised, parallel-armed, controlled trial. Ratings of perceived pain intensity were captured using a VAS from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain). Functional status was evaluated with a modified Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). This consists of 24 statements describing activity limitations resulting from back pain to which patients answer with either "yes," equal to 1 point, or "no," corresponding to zero, for a total of 24 possible points. A minimum score of zero corresponds to no disability, whereas a maximum score of 24 corresponds to maximum disability. For the purposes of this study, the RMDQ was adapted to focus on phantom limb pain. At the long-term follow-up assessment, patients were asked to rate their pain and to report whether they would have the cryoablation procedure again.

    Study population issues: Of the 21 patients, 17 (81%) had a lower extremity amputation (10 above knee and 7 below knee) and 4 (19%) had an upper extremity amputation (2 complete forequarter, 1 above elbow and 1 below elbow). A neuroma was identified in 13 (62%) patients. The mean time since amputation was 10 years. The mean pain intensity before the procedure was 6.2 and the mean functional status score was 11.3.

    Key efficacy findings

    Number of patients analysed: 21

    • Technical success=100%

    • Mean pain score (VAS, 0 to 10)

      • Before treatment=6.2 (95% CI 5.2 to 7.3)

      • 7 days after treatment=5.4 (95% CI 4.2 to 6.6), p=not significant compared with baseline

      • 45 days after treatment=2.3 (95% CI 1.6 to 3.0), p<0.0001 compared with baseline

      • At last follow up=2.0 (95% CI 0.9 to 3.0), p<0.0001 compared with baseline

    • Mean functional score (range 0 to 24)

      • Before treatment=11.3 (95% CI 8.8 to 13.9)

      • 7 days after treatment=9.4 (95% CI 7.3 to 11.5), p=not significant compared with baseline

      • 45 days after treatment=3.3 (95% CI 2.2 to 4.4), p<0.001 compared with baseline

    • When patients were asked if they would have the procedure again at the long-term follow-up assessment, 4 patients (19%) volunteered to have a second cryoablation, and 14 (67%) responded affirmatively.

    Repeat procedures

    All 4 of the repeat ablations were technically successful. The mean long-term follow-up assessment after the second ablation was 165 days. Pain intensity scores were statistically significantly decreased by a mean of 4.25 points (p=0.0013) compared with baseline of the first procedure. Of the 4 patients who had a repeat procedure, only 1 responded that they would have the procedure again.

    Explanatory variables identified through modelling

    • Statistically significant predictors were found for pain intensity ratings. Patients with upper limb amputations had greater mean pain intensity scores compared with patients with lower limb amputations, and patients with residual limb pain had lower baseline and lower overall improvements over time in pain intensity ratings compared with patients without residual limb pain.

    • No explanatory variables were found to influence functional status ratings either at each follow-up visit or over time.

    Key safety findings

    • During the initial days after the procedure, 6 patients (29%) had pain that needed additional anti-inflammatory prescription medication.

    • There were no reports of adverse events throughout the follow-up periods after either the cryoablation procedure or diagnostic nerve block.

    • One patient died, which was concluded to be unrelated to treatment or the patient's participation in the study.

    Study 5 Yoon J (2016)

    Study details

    Study type

    Case series

    Country

    US

    Recruitment period

    2011 to 2013

    Study population and number

    n=22 (3 plantar neuromas, 3 ilioinguinal, 4 posterior tibial, 7 saphenous, 1 gluteal, 1 sural, 1 geniculate, and 2 digital nerves were treated)

    Patients with refractory peripheral neuropathic pain

    Age and sex

    Mean age 49.5 years; 41% female

    Patient selection criteria

    Patients had peripheral neuropathy that failed to respond to first- and second-line therapy. Before referral for neurolysis, all patients had a complete evaluation by a pain physician that included motor testing. All patients showed a response to nerve blocks.

    Exclusion criteria included an inability to participate in the pain assessments at any of the scheduled follow-up intervals.

    Technique

    Device: PerCryo 17R (Endocare/Healthtronics, US) was used with ultrasound imaging. All procedures were done under deep sedation. The site of pain was localised by palpation and then the nerve proximal to the area of pain was localised using ultrasound. The ablation probe was advanced to the location of the nerve. When the nerve was localized, 2 to 3 ml of bupivacaine was injected into the nerve. For superficial nerves less than 1 to 2 cm from the skin surface, hydrodissection was used to elevate the skin from the probe tip to prevent skin injury. The ice ball formed as a sphere as much as 1.5 cm proximal to the tip of the probe, and saline solution was injected around this peripheral aspect of the ice ball to ensure at least 1 cm of separation from the ice ball to the skin surface to prevent thermal injury. The cryoablation was performed at 30% of maximum power with a single freeze cycle of 3 minutes. The probe tip reached a minimum temperature of about -135°C to -160°C. A single active thaw cycle was done until the probe temperature reached 5°C to 10°C.

    At the end of the procedure, ketorolac was given intravenously if the patient had no contraindication to it.

    Follow up

    12 months

    Conflict of interest/source of funding

    1 author has received grants from EDDA Technologies (US) and Endo Pharmaceuticals (US) outside the present work and has a patent pending for Scannerside (US). None of the other authors identified a conflict of interest.

    Analysis

    Follow up issues: No losses to follow up were described.

    Study design issues: Prospective case series, evaluating the safety and efficacy of cryoneurolysis in patients with refractory peripheral neuropathic pain. Pain levels were recorded on a VAS from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable. Assessment of pain and concomitant medications at the primary endpoints was done by telephone by an independent staff member who was not involved in the treatment of the patients. If a patient's pain score returned to baseline levels or was treated again with cryoablation, or if the treatment was ineffective, the highest recorded pain score was continued for all future time points, based on an intent-to-treat assumption. Therefore, after a patient's repeat treatment, their new postprocedural pain scores were not included in the analysis; only their highest pain score was included.

    Study population issues: nerves were treated at several different sites.

    Key efficacy findings

    Number of patients analysed: 22

    • Mean pain score (VAS, 0 to 10)

      • Before treatment=8.3 (SD 1.9)

      • 1 month after treatment=2.3 (SD 2.5), p=0.0001

      • 3 months after treatment=3.2 (SD 2.5), p=0.0002

      • 6 months after treatment=4.7 (SD 2.7), p=0.002

      • 12 months after treatment=5.1 (SD 3.7), p=0.03

    • Mean time to pain recurrence=9.3 months

    • Number of patients who had repeat cryoablation by follow up period

      • 1 month=1

      • 3 months=2

      • 6 months=3

      • 12 months=6

      • 13 to 18 months=5

    1 patient chose to have a neurectomy 9 months after the cryoablation procedure.

    Key safety findings

    The report stated that there were no complications.