How are you taking part in this consultation?

You will not be able to change how you comment later.

You must be signed in to answer questions

    The content on this page is not current guidance and is only for the purposes of the consultation process.

    1 Draft recommendations

    1.1

    More research is needed on endoscopic bipolar radiofrequency ablation for treating malignant biliary obstruction.

    1.2

    This procedure should only be done as part of a formal research study, and a research ethics committee needs to have approved its use.

    More research

    1.3

    More research is needed on:

    • patient selection

    • type, site and stage of tumour

    • quality of life

    • morbidity and mortality

    • complications.

    Why the committee made these recommendations

    The evidence for this procedure shows that there are no major safety concerns. It also suggests that the procedure can increase how long people live, but the reason for this is unclear. The evidence suggests that the procedure does not improve stent patency (how well and for how long a stent works). Also, there is no evidence on how the procedure affects quality of life, which is a key outcome. There is a lot of variability in the studies on the procedure. For example, they include different tumour types at different locations. They also use different types of stent and varying protocols for radiofrequency ablation. So, there are uncertainties, and more research is needed to better understand the procedure's benefits.