How are you taking part in this consultation?

You will not be able to change how you comment later.

You must be signed in to answer questions

    The content on this page is not current guidance and is only for the purposes of the consultation process.

    3 Committee considerations

    The evidence

    3.1

    NICE did a rapid review of the published literature on the efficacy and safety of this procedure. This comprised a comprehensive literature search and detailed review of the evidence from 5 sources, which was discussed by the committee. The evidence included 2 randomised controlled trials and 3 single-arm studies. It is presented in the summary of key evidence section in the interventional procedures overview. Other relevant literature is in the appendix of the overview.

    3.2

    The professional experts and the committee considered the key efficacy outcomes to be: reduction in blood pressure, reduction in use of antihypertensive medicines, reduction in end-organ damage and improvement in quality of life.

    3.3

    The professional experts and the committee considered the key safety outcomes to be: pain, bleeding, damage to renal arteries or other structures, and transient microleaks of alcohol.

    3.4

    Patient commentary was sought but none was received.

    Committee comments

    3.5

    There is a placebo effect on blood pressure reduction in the evidence, and the committee was informed that such an effect is common in hypertensive trials.

    3.6

    The evidence includes diverse groups and there may be subgroups who would benefit from the procedure.

    3.7

    This is an invasive procedure so more evidence is needed on safety.

    3.8

    This procedure is a single intervention and not intended to be repeated.

    3.9

    Technology has evolved over time and renal accessory arteries can be reached using a smaller catheter to achieve a more compete denervation.

    Tom Clutton-Brock
    Chair, interventional procedures advisory committee
    September 2024

    ISBN: