Evidence generation plan
Closed for comments This consultation ended on at Request commenting lead permission
2 Evidence gaps
This section describes the evidence gaps, why they need to be addressed and their relative importance for future committee decision making.
The committee will not be able to make a positive recommendation without the essential evidence gaps (see section 2.1) being addressed. Companies can strengthen their evidence base by also addressing as many other evidence gaps (see section 2.2) as possible. Addressing these will help the committee to make a recommendation by better understanding the patient or healthcare system benefits of the technology.
2.1 Essential evidence for future committee decision making
Change in weight
Evidence of sustained long-term weight loss is needed to evaluate the benefits for people using the technologies, because obesity is a chronic condition.
Monitoring and reporting adverse events
Obesity is a complex condition and people may have additional comorbidities including mental health issues. The committee had concerns about risk management and safety monitoring of the technologies, particularly in people taking weight-management medicine. Evidence on how the technologies monitor and report adverse events is needed to evaluate the safety of these technologies.
Resource use
To evaluate the cost effectiveness of the technologies, further information is needed on:
healthcare resource use, including number and type of healthcare appointments, NHS staff time needed to support using the technologies, the cost of the weight-management medicine, and referral to bariatric surgery
costs associated with implementing and maintaining the use of the technologies in an NHS pathway
cost estimates for specialist weight-management services.
2.2 Evidence that further supports committee decision making
Adherence and completion
More evidence is needed on adherence and completion for people using the technologies, to:
assess if adherence has any effect on clinical benefit
inform future economic modelling
understand if adherence is different in particular groups.
The reasons for stopping a technology are also important to understand. Information on patient characteristics is also needed to evaluate differences in access to the technologies and the potential impact on health inequalities.
Health-related quality of life and psychological outcomes
There is a high burden of mental health issues in people with obesity. Collecting additional data through specific patient-reported outcome measures on health-related quality of life and for psychological outcomes such as anxiety or depression and eating disorders is needed. This will support evaluation of the technologies' impact on mental wellbeing using consistent outcomes.
How are you taking part in this consultation?
You will not be able to change how you comment later.
You must be signed in to answer questions
Question on Document