How are you taking part in this consultation?

You will not be able to change how you comment later.

You must be signed in to answer questions

  • Question on Document

    Has all of the relevant evidence been taken into account?

  • Question on Document

    Are the summaries of clinical and cost effectiveness reasonable interpretations of the evidence?

  • Question on Document

    Are the recommendations sound and a suitable basis for guidance to the NHS?

  • Question on Document

    Are there any aspects of the recommendations that need particular consideration to ensure we avoid unlawful discrimination against any group of people on the grounds of age, disability, gender reassignment, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex or sexual orientation?
The content on this page is not current guidance and is only for the purposes of the consultation process.

Draft guidance consultation

Closed for comments This consultation ended on at   Request commenting lead permission

4 Evaluation committee members and NICE project team

Evaluation committee members

The 4 technology appraisal committees are standing advisory committees of NICE. This topic was considered by committee D.

Committee members are asked to declare any interests in the technology being evaluated. If it is considered there is a conflict of interest, the member is excluded from participating further in that evaluation.

The minutes of each evaluation committee meeting, which include the names of the members who attended and their declarations of interests, are posted on the NICE website.

Chair

Megan John
Chair, technology appraisal committee D

NICE project team

Each evaluation is assigned to a team consisting of 1 or more health technology analysts (who act as technical leads for the evaluation), a technical adviser and a project manager.

Emily Leckenby
Technical lead

Nigel Gumbleton, Caron Jones and Carl Prescott
Technical advisers

Kate Moore
Project manager

ISBN: [to be added at publication]