Evidence generation plan
Closed for comments This consultation ended on at Request commenting lead permission
6 Implementation considerations
The following considerations around implementing the evidence generation process have been identified through working with system partners:
Evidence generation
The companies could collect and analyse outcome data stratified by age to ensure that the evidence is informative in all clinically important subgroups, including children.
Accessing COSD has an application process that may take many months. Companies should plan adequate time to apply to use the data.
Equalities
Distance travelled by patients could be a barrier to access to RAS technologies. This is due to RAS technologies being available in larger trust hospitals doing more complicated surgical procedures. Care should be taken to ensure equitable access to RAS technologies. The NHS England robot-assisted surgery steering group may be influential in moderating this geographical placement of additional robotic systems, and the availability of training, resources and staff to implement robot-assisted surgery services, with national strategy going forward. They are actively analysing and mapping current robot-assisted surgery provision in England. A key priority will be equitable provision of robot-assisted surgery based on need rather than current configuration.
System considerations
While designing the training curriculum for RAS, care should be taken to ensure comparable surgical skills such as laparoscopic and open surgical skills are not lost.
The evidence generation process is most likely to succeed with dedicated and incentivised research staff to reduce the burden on NHS staff, and by using suitable real-world data to collect information when possible.
How are you taking part in this consultation?
You will not be able to change how you comment later.
You must be signed in to answer questions
Question on Consultation
Question on Consultation
Question on Consultation
Question on Consultation
Question on Document