National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Closed for comments This consultation ended on at Request commenting lead permission
Appendix A Comparisons of existing and refined HST routing criteria
Existing HST routing criteria | Proposed refined HST routing criteria |
---|---|
Criterion 1 The disease is very rare, defined by 1:50,000 in England. Criterion 3 The very rare disease for which the technology is indicated significantly shortens life or severely impairs its quality. | The disease is ultra-rare and debilitating Routing criterion 1 The disease is ultra-rare and debilitating, that is, it:
Definitions
|
Not applicable | We aim to encourage innovation and research Routing criterion 2 The technology is an innovation for the ultra-rare disease. Definitions
|
Criterion 2 Normally, no more than 300 people in England are eligible for the technology for its licensed indication and no more than 500 across all its possible indications | The technology should be limited to the population in its licensed indication Routing criterion 3 No more than 300 people in England are eligible for the technology in its licensed indication, and the technology is not an individualised medicine. Definitions
|
Criterion 4 There are no other satisfactory treatment options, or the technology is likely to offer significant additional benefit over existing treatment options | There are no effective treatment options Routing criterion 4 The technology is likely to offer substantial additional benefit for people over existing established clinical management, and the existing established clinical management is considered inadequate. Definitions
|
How are you taking part in this consultation?
You will not be able to change how you comment later.
You must be signed in to answer questions
Question on Consultation
Question on Consultation
Question on Consultation
Question on Consultation
Question on Consultation