Evidence
How we made the decision
How we made the decision
We check our guidelines regularly to ensure they remain up to date. We based the decision on surveillance 4 years after the publication of ovarian cancer (2011) NICE guideline CG122.
For details of the process and update decisions that are available, see ensuring that published guidelines are current and accurate in 'Developing NICE guidelines: the manual'.
An evidence update was previously published and is available on our website.
New evidence
We found 51 new studies in a search for randomised control trials and RCTs published between 09 July 2012 and 01 June 2015. We also considered 8 additional studies identified by members of the Guideline Committee who originally worked on this guideline. We also considered 19 additional studies identified through stakeholder consultation.
Evidence identified in the previous evidence update (January 2013) was also considered. This included 14 studies identified by search.
From all sources, 91 studies were considered to be relevant to the guideline.
We also checked for relevant ongoing research, which will be evaluated again at the next surveillance review of the guideline.
See appendix A: decision matrix for summaries and references for all new evidence considered in surveillance of this guideline.
Views of topic experts
We considered the views of topic experts, including those who helped to develop the guideline.
Views of stakeholders
Stakeholders commented on the decision not to update the guideline. Comments received from stakeholders at consultation expressed a need for NICE to review the recommendations on serum tumour markers for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer, in particular the role of HE4 and ROMA. Following stakeholder consultation it was agreed to update the guideline. See appendix 2 for stakeholders' comments and our responses.
See ensuring that published guidelines are current and accurate in 'Developing NICE guidelines: the manual' for more details on our consultation processes.
This page was last updated: