How we made the decision

We check our guidelines regularly to ensure they remain up to date. We based the decision on surveillance 4 years after the publication of lung cancer (2011) NICE guideline CG121.

For details of the process and update decisions that are available, see ensuring that published guidelines are current and accurate in Developing NICE guidelines: the manual.

New evidence

We found 298 new studies in a search for randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews published between 28 May 2012 and 8 June 2015.

Evidence identified in an Evidence Update from 2 years after publication of the guideline was also considered. This included 22 studies identified by a literature search.

From all sources, 320 studies were considered to be relevant to the guideline.

We also checked for relevant ongoing research, which will be evaluated again at the next surveillance review of the guideline.

See appendix A: decision matrix for summaries and references for all new evidence considered.

Views of topic experts

We considered the views of topic experts, including those who helped to develop the guideline.

Views of stakeholders

Stakeholders are consulted only if we decide not to update the guideline following checks at 4 and 8 years after publication. Because this was a 4-year surveillance review, and the decision was to update, we did not consult on the decision.

See ensuring that published guidelines are current and accurate in Developing NICE guidelines: the manual for more details on our consultation processes.

NICE Surveillance programme project team

Sarah Willett
Associate Director

Philip Alderson
Consultant Clinical Adviser

Emma McFarlane
Technical Adviser

Stephen Sharp
Technical Analyst

The NICE project team would like to thank the topic experts who participated in the surveillance process.


This page was last updated: