Tools and resources

Appendix B: Risks and benefits of induction of labour compared to expectant management for suspected fetal macrosomia (in women without diabetes)

Appendix B: Risks and benefits of induction of labour compared to expectant management for suspected fetal macrosomia (in women without diabetes)

Table 7: Outcomes for babies and women

Outcome

Induction of labour

Expectant management

Risk difference

Shoulder dystocia

About 410 babies would per 10,000 would be expected to have a shoulder dystocia (so 9,590 would not)

About 680 babies per 10,000 would be expected to have a shoulder dystocia (so 9,320 would not)

About 270 more babies per 10,000 whose mother's birth was managed expectantly would be expected to have a shoulder dystocia; so for 9,730 the outcome would be the same irrespective of the management strategy

Third or fourth degree perineal tears

About 260 per 10,000 women would be expected to have third or fourth degree tears (so 9,740 would not)

About 69 per 10,000 women would be expected to have third or fourth degree tears (so 9,931 would not)

About 191 women whose labour was induced would be expected to have third or fourth degree tears; so for 9,809 the outcome would be the same irrespective of the management strategy

For sources of risk data, see evidence review A.

Table 8: Outcomes for babies and women that are likely to be the same with induction of labour and expectant management

Outcomes

  • Perinatal death

  • Brachial plexus injury

  • Caesarean birth

For sources of risk data, see evidence review A.


This page was last updated: