Advice
Results tables
Results tables
Table 6 Bresolin et al. 1990 (open label phase)
Co-enzyme Q10 2 mg per kg daily |
Analysis |
|
N a |
44 |
|
Selected outcomes |
||
Global MRC muscle scale score (%)b |
Results presented graphically. No absolute values reported |
Statistically significant increase from baseline after 6 months treatment (from approximately 89% to 91%cp<0.01) |
Mean serum lactate levels 5 minutes after exercise (mg %) |
Results presented graphically. No absolute values reported |
Statistically significant decrease from baseline after 6 months treatment (from approximately 68 to 52 mg %c p<0.0001) |
a Fifty-nine participants entered study. However, 15 participants did not complete the study and results were only reported for the 44 remaining participants. b MRC muscle scale grades muscle power on a scale of 0 to 5 in relation to the maximum expected for that muscle. Study results were presented as a percentage. It is unclear from the information provided in the paper what these percentages represent and the clinical significance of any reported improvements. Five muscle groups were assessed and a global score was presented for all muscle groups. c Figures estimated from inspection of graph. |
||
Abbreviations: MRC, Medical Research Council. |
Table 7 Bresolin et al. 1990 (comparative phase)
Co-enzyme Q10 2 mg per kg daily a |
Placebo a |
Analysis |
|
N |
8 |
8 |
|
Selected outcomes |
|||
Global MRC muscle scale score (%)b |
Results presented graphically. No absolute values reported |
No significant change in either group after entering comparative phase |
|
Mean serum lactate levels 5 minutes after exercise (mg %) |
Results presented graphically. No absolute values reported |
All participants showed a statistically significant decrease from baseline after 6 months treatment with co-enzyme Q10. In the group treated with a further 3 months of co-enzyme Q10, the decrease from baseline to 9 months was statistically significant (p<0.01). In the group switched to placebo for 3 months, the decrease from baseline to 9 months was not statistically significant (p value not stated) |
|
a Participants had all completed open-label phase so had all received 6 months of co-enzyme Q10. Co-enzyme Q10 group therefore had 9 months of co-enzyme Q10 and placebo group had 6 months of co-enzyme Q10 and 3 months of placebo. b MRC muscle scale grades muscle power on a scale of 0 to 5 in relation to the maximum expected for that muscle. Study results were presented as a percentage. It is unclear from the information provided in the paper what these percentages represent and the clinical significance of any reported improvements. Five muscle groups were assessed and a global score was presented for all muscle groups. |
|||
Abbreviations: MRC, Medical Research Council. |
Table 8 Chen et al. 1997
Co-enzyme Q10 160 mg daily |
Placebo |
Analysis |
|
N |
8 |
8 |
|
Selected outcomes |
|||
Fatigability in ADLa |
Results presented graphically. No absolute values reported |
No statistical significant difference between co-enzyme Q10 and placebo |
|
Score on MRC muscle scale (%)b |
Results presented graphically. No absolute values reported |
After 3 months treatment with co-enzyme Q10 there was no statistically significant change in the score for the 4 individual muscle groups assessed. There was a statistically significant increase in the global score from all muscle groups combined (from approximately 83% to 87%)b,c |
|
Sustained endurance strength (mean time taken in seconds to perform specified activities) |
Results presented graphically. No absolute values reported |
No statistical significant difference between co-enzyme Q10 and placebo |
|
a Scored on a 6 point scale from 1 (minimal or no fatigue) to 6 (severe impairment of activities of daily living and use of walking assistance or in wheelchair). b MRC muscle scale grades muscle power on a scale of 0 to 5 in relation to the maximum expected for that muscle. Study results were presented as a percentage. It is unclear from the information provided in the paper what these percentages represent and the clinical significance of any reported improvements. Four muscle group were assessed: upper extremity distal and proximal muscles and lower extremity distal and proximal muscles. A global score was presented for all muscle groups. c Figures estimated from inspection of graph. |
|||
Abbreviations: ADL, activities of daily living; MRC, Medical Research Council. |
Table 9 Glover et al. 2010
Co-enzyme Q10 600 mg twice daily |
Placebo |
Analysis |
|
N a |
30 |
30 |
|
Selected outcomes b |
|||
Mean (SEM) mitochondrial disease specific ADL questionnaire scorec |
5.14 (0.19) |
4.73 (0.19) |
No statistical significant difference between co-enzyme Q10 and placebo (p=0.26) |
Mean (SEM) mitochondrial disease specific QOL questionnaire scorec |
5.06 (0.16) |
4.66 (0.27) |
No statistical significant difference between co-enzyme Q10 and placebo (p=0.09) |
Mean (SEM) maximal isometric forearm strength (Nm)d |
23.8 (1.8) |
24.6 (1.6) |
No statistical significant difference between co-enzyme Q10 and placebo (p=0.27) |
a Not all participants completed all outcomes. Complete data for the ADL and QOL questionnaires was available for 22 participants. b All outcomes assessed after 60 days taking co-enzyme Q10 and after 60 days taking placebo. c These consisted of a series of questions that assessed the participants' capacity to perform tasks such as cooking and housework and perceived health and well-being measured on a visual-analogue scale from 0 to 100 mm. d Ninety second (9 second contraction and 1 second rest) isometric handgrip fatigue test. |
|||
Abbreviations: ADL, activities of daily living; HR, heart rate (beats per minute); Nm, maximal isometric grip strength in newton; QOL, quality of life; RER; respiratory exchange rate (VCO2/VO2); SEM, standard error of the mean; VE, minute ventilation (litre/minute); VO2; oxygen uptake (ml/kg lean body mass). |