How are you taking part in this consultation?

You will not be able to change how you comment later.

You must be signed in to answer questions

    The content on this page is not current guidance and is only for the purposes of the consultation process.

    References

    1. Xie J, Zhang HX, Wang L et al. (2017) Comparison of supercapsular percutaneously assisted approach total hip versus conventional posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 12(1): 138

    2. Meng WK, Gao L, Huang Z et al. (2021) Supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPath) versus mini-incision posterolateral total hip arthroplasty for hip osteoarthritis: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Ann Transl Med 9 (5): 392

    3. Korytkin AA, Novikova YS, El Moudni YM et al. (2021) A prospective randomised comparison of earlier function after total hip arthroplasty with a mini posterior approach or supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip approach: a gait analysis study. HIP International

    4. Rasuli KJ and Gofton W (2015) Percutaneously assisted total hip (PATH) and supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip (SuperPATH) arthroplasty: learning curves and early outcomes. Ann Transl Med 3 (13):179

    5. Mas Martinez J, Sanz-Reig J, Morales-Santias M et al. (2019) Comparative cohort study of the SuperPath approach and the conventional posterior approach in primary cementless hip replacement surgery. Revista espanola de cirugia ortopedica y traumatologia 63(5): 346-54

    6. Quitmann H (2019) Supercapsular percutaneously assisted (SuperPath) approach in total hip arthroplasty: Surgical technique and preliminary results. Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie 31(6): 536-46

    7. NJR (2020a) Implant summary report for Profemur L Classic Stem. Unpublished.

    NJR (2020b) Implant summary report for Profemur L Modular Stem. Unpublished.

    NJR (2020c) Implant summary report for Procotyl L Cup. Unpublished.