How are you taking part in this consultation?

You will not be able to change how you comment later.

You must be signed in to answer questions

    The content on this page is not current guidance and is only for the purposes of the consultation process.

    Evidence summary

    Population and studies description

    Interstitial cystitis

    This interventional procedures overview is based on 73 adults from 1 randomised prospective study (Gulpinar 2014), 2 cohort studies (Rosamilia 1997; Riedl 1998a), 1 single-arm trial (Gurpinar 1996), and 1 case report (Hinkel 2004). Of these 73 people, 58 had the procedure. This is a rapid review of the literature, and a flow chart of the complete selection process is shown in figure 1a. This overview presents 4 studies as the key evidence in table 2a and table 3a, and lists 2 other relevant studies in appendix B, table 5a.

    The randomised prospective study was the only comparative study (Gulpinar 2014), and was done in Turkey. The other key studies are single-arm cohort studies from Australia (Rosamilia 1997), Austria (Riedl 1998a) and the US (Gurpinar 1996). One case report (Hinkel 2004) described the safety outcome only. The mean age of people with interstitial cystitis considered for efficacy outcomes was between 42 and 62 years. Most of the people who had the procedure were female, as reported by the studies. Follow up was 24 months in the randomised study (Gulpinar 2014). In the 2 cohort studies, mean follow up was 6 months (Rosamilia 1997) and 10 months (Riedl 1998a). Follow up was between 3 months and 18 months in the single-arm trial (Gurpinar 1996). Table 2a presents study details. Follow up was not reported in the case report study (Hinkel 2004).

    Overactive bladder

    There was evidence from 184 adults from 2 prospective cohort studies done in Germany (Bach 2009, Gauruder-Burmester 2008), 1 prospective cohort study done in Norway (Schiotz 2017) and 1 prospective cohort study done in Austria (Riedl 1998b). This is a rapid review of the literature, and a flow chart of the complete selection process is shown in figure 1b. This overview presents 4 studies as the key evidence in table 2b and table 3b and 2 other relevant studies in appendix B, table 5b.

    Among the studies, the mean age of people with OAB having the procedure was between 60 and 67 years. Most of the people who had the procedure were women. One cohort study had 8 weeks follow up after the third EMDA (Bach 2009). One cohort study had 12 months follow up after the last EMDA treatment (Gauruder-Burmester 2008). One cohort study had 6 months of follow up after 1 outpatient EMDA session (Schiotz 2017). One study did not report the follow-up time (Riedl 1998b).

    Figure 1a Flow chart of study selection of electrically stimulated intravesical therapy for interstitial cystitis

    Figure 1b Flow chart of study selection of electrically stimulated intravesical therapy for overactive bladder

    Table 2a Study details of electrically stimulated intravesical therapy for interstitial cystitis

    Study no.

    First author, date

    country

    Characteristics of people in the study

    Age (years)

    Study design

    Inclusion criteria

    Intervention

    Follow up

    1

    Gulpinar, 2014
    Turkey

    N=31 (male: female as reported by the study = 6:25)

    16 intervention (3:13) and 15 comparator (3:12) intravesical hyaluronic acid via catheter

    Mean in the EMDA group = 42.8

    Mean in the catheter group = 43.5

    Randomised prospective study

    People who were diagnosed with BPS or IC between 2004 and 2005 according to the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases criteria for BPS or IC.

    Exclusion criteria: any other medication for IC during the study period, neurogenic bladder, history of pelvic surgery or trauma to the pelvic region, presence of active urinary tract infection, frequency of urination less than 8 times, presence of bladder or lower ureteral calculi, benign or malignant bladder tumours, active genital herpes infection, or chemical or radiation cystitis.

    40 mg hyaluronic acid (Cythyal) in 40 ml saline instillation in the bladder administered through a special 16‑Fr catheter for EMDA with a spiral silver electrode in the first part with EMDA: polarity positive, rise rate 30 to 60 mA/second, peak current 60 mA, pulsed output, and treatment time 25 minutes.

    Comparator:

    40 mg intravesical hyaluronic acid administered through a hydrophilic 12‑Fr Foley catheter, retained for at least 60 minutes.

    Both groups had weekly instillations in the first month, and then monthly after 2 months.

    24 months

    2

    Rosamilia, 1997
    Australia

    N=21 (male: female as reported by the study = 0:21)
    N=24 procedures;
    3 people had a repeat procedure


    Median = 48 (range 22 to 80)

    Cohort study

    Females with IC diagnosed using National Institute of Arthritis, Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases Workshop

    2% sodium chloride-free lidocaine hydrochloride, adrenaline 1.5 mg and dexamethasone 16 mg in 150 ml sterile water. Administered using a 18‑Fr catheter commercially fitted with a silver-coated anode, and EMDA with 30 mA current for 20 to 30 minutes

    6 months

    3

    Riedl, 1998a
    Austria

    N=13 (male: female as reported by the study = 2:11)
    N=42 procedures; between 1 and 7 procedures per person

    Mean = 62.2

    Cohort study

    People who were diagnosed with IC between December 1993 and July 1995 according to the US National Institute of Health criteria

    People with low capacity-bladders (less than 250 ml):

    Lidocaine 2% 100 ml, dexamethasone 15 mg, epinephrine 0.5 mg. 15 mA current.


    People with bladder capacities over 250 ml:

    Lidocaine 2.6% 150 ml, dexamethasone 20 mg, epinephrine 0.75 mg.
    22 mA current.

    Both groups had EMDA with the pulsed direct current for 20 minutes, followed by hydrodistension of the bladder up to 200% of the cystometric bladder capacity for 1 to 5 minutes.

    Retreatments performed at the person's request.

    Mean 10 months (range: 3 to 22 months)

    4

    Gurpinar, 1996
    US

    N=6
    (men: women = 0:6)

    Mean = 44.8 (range 28 to 60)

    Single-arm trial

    People with long-standing IC who had multiple IC modalities

    100 ml lidocaine-epinephrine solution instillation administered using an 18‑Fr, intraurinary silver-coated stainless-steel electrode catheter and through EMDA. A rise of current to 15 mA over 2 minutes, then 15 mA current maintained for additional 38 minutes.

    Between 3 and 18 months

    5

    Hinkel, 2004 Germany

    N=2 (male: female as reported by the study = 2:0)

    Mean = 75 (range 72 to 78)

    Case report

    People with chronic non-infectious cystitis

    100 ml lidocaine 4%, 2 ml epinephrine 1:1,000, 10 ml dexamethasone (40 mg), diluted in 100 ml Aquadest.

    Positive polarity, rise-rate 50 mA/second, current 22 mA, and pulse modus. Treatment time 30 minutes.

    Not reported

    Table 2b Study details of electrically stimulated intravesical therapy for overactive bladder

    Study no.

    First author, date

    country

    Characteristics of people in the study

    Age (years)

    Study design

    Inclusion criteria

    Intervention

    Follow up

    1

    Bach, 2009
    Germany

    N=84 (men: women = 12:72)

    Median = 63.1

    Prospective cohort study

    People with idiopathic detrusor overactivity who had previously had antimuscarinic (anticholinergic) treatment for at least 8 weeks with no improvement of urgency.

    Exclusion criteria: neural deficiencies or symptoms during physical examination, previous spinal surgery, or an infectious urine sample

    2,000 mg lidocaine-hydrochloride 4% (50 ml), 2 mg epinephrine (1:1,000) (2 ml), 40 mg dexamethasone‑21‑dihydrogen phosphate (10 ml) in a total volume of 100 ml administered via EMDA. 30 mA current for 30 minutes.

    EMDA was done at least 3 times in 4‑weeks during 2‑day hospital stays.

    8 weeks (after the third EMDA)

    2

    Gauruder-Burmester, 2008
    Germany

    N=72 (men: women = 0:72)

    Mean = 63 (SD 11.2)

    Prospective cohort study

    History of persisting OAB for over 24 months and therapeutic attempts with at least 2 different anticholinergic medicines and at least 6 months of physiotherapy without improvement or cure of symptoms: frequency (voiding more than 8 times a day), nocturia (voiding more than once a night), and urge incontinence

    100 ml 4% lidocaine hydrochloride (sodium chloride-free), 100 ml distilled water, 40 mg dexamethasone sodium phosphate, and 2 ml epinephrine.

    15 to 25 mA current for 20 to 25 minutes.

    3 EMDA cycles, each with 3 instillations at 2‑week intervals during a 3‑day hospital stay.

    12 months (after the last treatment)

    3

    Schiotz, 2017
    Norway

    N=14 (men: women = 0:14)

    Mean = 59.9

    (SD 13.9, range 31 to 79)

    Prospective cohort study

    Women with severe, treatment resistant OAB, more than 3 months duration, failed conservative and pharmacological treatment and indication for standard cystoscopic injection of botulinum toxin.

    Exclusion criteria: age under 18 years, mixed incontinence with dominant stress incontinence, ongoing UTI, and contraindication to treatment with botulinum toxin.

    60 ml of normal saline with 200 Allergan units of botulinum toxin A administered via EMDA.

    20 mA current for 30 minutes.

    1 outpatient session.

    6 months

    4

    Riedl, 1998b

    Austria

    N=14 (treatments n=29)
    (male: female as reported by the study = 4:10)

    Mean = 67.3 (range 22 to 84)

    Prospective cohort study

    People with detrusor hyperreflexia or urge incontinence who did not tolerate or improve on oral anticholinergic medicines.

    15 mg to 50 mg oxybutynin hydrochloride in 0.3% saline.

    15 mA for 20 minutes.

    Not reported

    Table 3a Study outcomes of electrically stimulated intravesical therapy for interstitial cystitis

    First author, date

    Efficacy outcomes

    Safety outcomes

    Gulpinar, 2014

    EMDA treatment associated with significantly higher treatment response (based on the global response assessment), HR: 2.457 (95% CI: 1.458 to 3.897), p=0.011.

    Overall, there were statistically significant differences in frequency, nocturia, and VAS between the 2 groups at 6 months and 12 months, but no statistically significant difference in any of these outcomes at 1 month and 24 months.

    Voiding frequency (per 24 hours):

    • 1 month, the EMDA group had a mean absolute change of -1.9 (SD 0.7) compared with -2.1 (SD 0.7) in the catheter group (p=0.152).

    • 6 months, the EMDA group had a mean absolute change of -7.9 (SD 0.7) compared with -5.1 (SD 0.7) in the catheter group (p=0.012).

    • 12 months, the EMDA group had a mean absolute change of -8.1 (SD 0.7) compared with -5.0 (SD 0.7) in the catheter group (p=0.022).

    • 24 months, the EMDA group had a mean absolute change of -3.8 (SD 0.7) compared with -4.0 (SD 0.7) in the catheter group (p=0.341).

    Nocturia (per night):

    • 1 month, the EMDA group had a mean absolute change of -0.5 (SD 0.2) compared with -0.6 (SD 0.2) in the catheter group (p=0.354).

    • 6 months, the EMDA group had a mean absolute change of -2.5 (SD 0.2) compared with -1.6 (SD 0.2) in the catheter group (p=0.038).

    • 12 months, the EMDA group had a mean absolute change of -2.4 (SD 0.2) compared with -1.5 (SD 0.2) in the catheter group (p=0.024).

    • 24 months, the EMDA group had a mean absolute change of -1.5 (SD 0.2) compared with -1.6 (SD 0.2) in the catheter group (p=0.744).

    VAS

    • 1 month, the EMDA group had a mean absolute change of -1.0 (SD 0.6) compared with -1.1 (SD 0.6) in the catheter group (p=0.565).

    • 6 months, the EMDA group had a mean absolute change of -4.6 (SD 2.6) compared with -3.1 (SD 1.6) in the catheter group (p=0.013).

    • 12 months, the EMDA group had a mean absolute change of -4.8 (SD 2.4) compared with -3.0 (SD 1.6) in the catheter group (p=0.016).

    • 24 months, The EMDA group had a mean absolute change of -2.2 (SD 0.8) compared with -2.0 (SD 0.9) in the catheter group (p=0.632).

    No SAE reported.

    No patients refused treatment because of side effects.

    Rosamilia, 1997

    85% (18 out of 21) had a good response (reduction in pain score by 3 or more and reduction in frequency at 2 weeks).

    63% were still having a response at 2 months.

    25% (4 out of 16) had an excellent response (pain score of 0) at 6 months.

    Mean urinary frequency

    • Baseline: 15.5 (range 9 to 26, n=21)

    • 2 months: 11.1 (range 6 to 19, n=21), p<0.05

    • 6 months: 12.7 (range 7 to 17, n=7), p>0.05

    Median pain score

    • Baseline: 8 (range 2 to 10, n=21)

    • 2 weeks: 3 (range 0 to 8, n=21), p<0.05

    • 2 months: 4 (range 0 to 10, n=21), p<0.05

    • 6 months: 5 (range 0 to 9, n=16), p<0.05

    No SAE reported.
    Erythema at abdominal electrode site was common but resolved within a few hours.
    Most people had haematuria at the end of draining the bladder.

    Riedl, 1998a

    8 out of 13 had complete response, 3 out of 13 had partial response, 2 out of 13 deteriorated.

    Complete response: urgency and bladder pain in combination with a reduction of urinary frequency for at least 1 week.

    Partial response: reduction of bladder symptom for less than 1 week.

    Mean duration of symptom improvement: 4.5 months (0.75 to 17 range)

    8 out of 13 people reported 'significant' QoL improvement.
    12 people said EMDA was tolerable and they would undergo retreatment.

    5 people said EMDA was ineffective, including 1 person who had a complete response for 2 months.

    No SAE.

    Everyone had skin erythema observed within hours at abdominal electrode, no skin blistering.

    Two people showed bladder symptoms deterioration, occurred about 30 minutes after therapy, lasting for 1 to 4 days. Local anaesthesia was incomplete in both.

    Gurpinar, 1996

    Voiding symptoms decreased. Four people had durable and 'significant' response.

    Voiding-specific quality of life scores improved.

    2 people had temporary improvement but subsequently had additional local bladder treatments

    No SAE reported.

    No one experienced pain or significant discomfort. Some people reported a tingling sensation on the abdominal skin during the treatment.

    Hinkel, 2004

    Not reported

    Both people showed signs of transient ischaemic attack signs, at 3 hours and 6 hours after having EMDA.

    Table 3b Study outcomes of electrically stimulated intravesical therapy for overactive bladder

    First author, date

    Efficacy outcome

    Safety outcomes

    Bach, 2009

    After second EMDA sessions (n=84),

    Mean voiding frequency per day

    Baseline= 14.1 (SE 7.7)

    4 weeks= 9.4 (SE 6.2), p<0.0001

    8 weeks= 9.3 (SE 4.1), p<0.0001

    Nocturia per night

    Baseline= 5.1 (SE 5.1)

    4 weeks= 2.5 (SE 2.4), p=0.035

    8 weeks= 4.3 (SE 4.1), p>0.1

    Impact of QoL

    Baseline= 11.8 (SE 3.2)

    4 weeks= 7.3 (SE 4.1), p=0.018

    8 weeks=10.1 (SE 3.5), p>0.1

    No SAE reported.

    2 people developed abdominal skin erythema underneath electrodes and complained about pain during the second EMDA session, resulting in the treatment being aborted.

    Gauruder-Burmester, 2008

    Voiding frequency per day decreased from 16 (SD 3) to 7 (SD 2). This was statistically significant (p=0.003).

    Decreased nocturia from 5 (SD 2) to 2 (SD 1). No statistical significance or p-value was reported.

    QoL was improved in 54 people (75%)
    (p = 0.002).

    Sexual sensations and sexual satisfaction was improved in 39 people (54%)
    (p = 0.001)

    No SAE reported.

    12 women developed reactive hypertension during treatment, which returned to normal without any intervention.

    21 people showed signs of dysuria and haematuria.

    10 women experienced UTI

    1 person developed urinary retention, which disappeared after 2 catheterisation procedures.

    Schiotz, 2017

    Mean voiding frequency per 24 hours

    • Baseline=11 (SD 2.2, n=14)

    • 1 month=9.2 (SD 3.2, n=14), p=0.023

    • 3 months=11.1 (SD 3.3, n=14), p=0.44

    • 6 months=9.4 (SD 0.9, n=5), p=0.37

    Mean incontinence episode per 24 hours

    • Baseline=5.5 (SD 3.8, n=14)

    • 1 month=2.2 (SD 2.6, n=14), p=0.001

    • 3 months=3.3 (SD 3.2, n=14), p=0.01

    • 6 months=2.4 (SD 0.9, n=5), p=0.01.

    No SAE.

    Most people had transient, mild, painless abdominal skin erythema for a few hours after treatment.

    3 episodes of acute cystitis in 2 people with prior history of recurrent UTI.

    Riedl, 1998b

    3 people had improved bladder symptoms for more than 1 week, 4 people had improved bladder symptoms for less than 1 week, 4 people had no improvement.

    No local or systemic side effects were observed.

    Treatment was stopped in 3 people because of bladder contractions and leakage.

    Procedure technique

    Interstitial cystitis

    Of the 5 studies, 3 single-arm cohort studies (Riedl 1998a, Rosamilia 1997, Gurpinar 1996), and 1 case report study (Hinkel 2004) named the manufacturer of the current generator device used for EMDA. The randomised prospective study did not name the generator used but mentioned the use of the 16‑Fr special catheter designed by the same manufacturer (Gulpinar 2014). The medicine solution and electric current used in EMDA varied within and between studies. The medicine solution included hyaluronic acid, lidocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline and dexamethasone, and lidocaine with adrenaline. The electric current used was between 15 mA and 60 mA. The procedure time varied between studies from 20 to 38 minutes. The number of procedures varied between studies.

    Overactive bladder

    Of the 4 studies, 3 studies named the same device from the same manufacturer used for EMDA (Bach 2009, Gauruder-Burmester 2008, Schiotz 2017). The medicine solution, electric current and treatment time given in EMDA varied between studies. The medicine solution included lidocaine with dexamethasone and adrenaline, botulinum toxin A in normal saline, and oxybutynin hydrochloride. The electric current used was between 15 mA and 30 mA with 20 to 30 minutes treatment time.

    The number of procedures per person varied between studies. Two prospective cohort studies in an adult population did the procedure 3 times with hospital stays (Bach 2009 and Gauruder-Burmester 2008). One prospective cohort study did the procedure once in an outpatient setting (Schiotz 2017).

    Efficacy

    Interstitial cystitis

    Frequency

    Two studies reported data on voiding frequency.

    In the randomised prospective study comparing the administration of hyaluronic acid via EMDA (n=16) with standard intravesical treatment (n=15), at 6 months the EMDA arm had a mean absolute change of voiding frequency per day of -7.9 (SD 0.7) compared with -5.1 (SD 0.7) in the catheter group. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.012). At 12 months, The EMDA group had a mean absolute change of -8.1 (SD 0.7) compared with -5.0 (SD 0.7) in the catheter group. This difference was also statistically significant (p=0.022). But, no statistically significant difference was observed at 1 month and 24 months follow up (Gulpinar 2014).

    In a single-arm cohort study of 21 people, the mean urinary frequency per 24 hours at 2 months after EMDA was 11.1 compared with 15.5 at baseline (p=0.004). But, at 6 months follow up, the mean urinary frequency per 24 hours was 12.7 (n=7), which was not statistically significantly different (p value not reported; Rosamilia 1997).

    Nocturia

    The randomised prospective study of 31 people was the only study reporting data on nocturia. At 6 months, the EMDA group had a mean absolute change of nocturia per night of -2.5 (SD 0.2) compared with -1.6 (SD 0.2) in the catheter group. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.038). At 12 months, the EMDA group had a mean absolute change of -2.4 (SD 0.2) compared with -1.5 (SD 0.2) in the catheter group. This difference was also statistically significant (p=0.024). In line with the frequency outcome, no statistically significant mean difference of nocturia between hyaluronic acid through EMDA compared with a catheter was observed at 1 month and 24 months follow up (Gulpinar 2014).

    Pain

    Two studies reported data on pain.

    In the randomised prospective study of 31 people, pain was measured using VAS. At 6 months, the EMDA group had a mean absolute change of -4.6 (SD 2.6) compared with -3.1 (SD 1.6) in the catheter group. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.013). At 12 months, The EMDA group had a mean absolute change of -4.8 (SD 2.4) compared with -3.0 (SD 1.6) in the catheter group. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.016). Similar to the frequency and nocturia, there was no statistically significant difference in pain at 1‑month and 24‑month follow up (Gulpinar 2014).

    In the single-arm cohort study of 21 people, the pain was measured using a 0 to 10 scale. The median pain score before treatment was 8. The median pain scores were 3 at 2 weeks after EMDA (n=21), 4 at 2 months after EMDA (n=21), and 5 at 6 months after EMDA (n=16). The reductions in pain score in all 3 follow-up periods were statistically significant (p<0.05; Rosamilia 1997).

    Treatment response

    One randomised prospective cohort study compared the treatment response of hyaluronic acid administered with EMDA compared with a catheter, based on the GRA score. Treatment with EMDA was associated with higher response rates, with HR: 2.457 (95% CI 1.458 to 3.897), p=0.011.

    Complete and partial response

    One single-arm cohort study described a complete response as the complete resolution of urgency and bladder pain in combination with a reduction of urinary frequency for at least 1 week. A partial response was defined as the reduction of the bladder symptom for less than 1 week. A total of 8 out of 13 (62%) people had complete response, 3 (22%) experienced partial response, and 2 (16%) had deterioration of symptoms. The mean duration of symptom improvement was 4.5 months (range 0.75 to 17 months; Riedl 1998a).

    Quality of Life

    One single-arm cohort study reported QoL but no outcome measure was mentioned. Eight out of 13 people (62%) reported 'significant' QoL improvement (p value not reported; Riedl 1998a).

    Total voiding symptom

    One single-arm cohort study compared the total voiding symptom at 1 week before and 1 week after EMDA. Four out of 6 people experienced 'significant' and durable responses and 2 had temporary responses. The voiding symptom outcome measure used was developed locally (Gurpinar 1996).

    Overactive bladder

    Frequency

    Three studies reported data on voiding frequency.

    In the prospective cohort study (n=84), after 2 EMDA sessions, mean daytime frequency decreased from 14.1 (SE 7.7) per day to 9.4 (SE 6.2) per day. This change was statistically significant (p<0.0001), and was maintained at 8 weeks follow up, when the mean daytime frequency was 9.3 (SE 4.1; p<0.0001; Bach 2009).

    In the prospective cohort study (n=72), there was a statistically significant decrease in voiding frequency per day from 16 to 7 (p=0.003; Gauruder-Burmester 2008).

    In the prospective cohort studies of 14 people, there was a statistically significant decrease in mean voiding frequency per 24 hours from 11 (SD 2.2) at baseline to 9.2 (SD 3.2) at 1 month (p=0.023). There was no statistically significant difference at 3 months (11.1 [SD 3.3], p=0.44), or 6 months (9.4 [SD 0.9], p=0.37, n=5; Schiotz 2017).

    Nocturia

    Two studies reported data on nocturia.

    In the prospective cohort study (n=84), after 2 EMDA sessions, nocturia per night decreased from 5.1 (SE 5.1) per night to 2.5 (SE 2.4) per night. This change was statistically significant (p=0.035). But, it then rose to 4.3 (SE 4.1) at 8 weeks follow up (p>0.1; Bach 2009).

    In the prospective cohort study (n=72), there was a decrease of nocturia from 5 to 2. No statistical significance or p-value was reported. (Gauruder-Burmester 2008).

    Quality of life

    Two studies reported data on QoL, assessed using the validated KHQ.

    In the prospective cohort study (n=84), a reduction of impact in QoL was observed from 11.8 (SE 3.2) to 7.3 (SE 4.1; p<0.018) at 4 weeks. But, at 8 weeks follow up, it rose to 10.1 (SE 3.5; p>0.1; Bach 2009).

    In the prospective cohort study (n=72), an improvement in QoL was observed in 54 people (75%; p=0.002; Gauruder-Burmester 2008).

    Sexual sensation and satisfaction

    One prospective cohort study (n=72) reported an improvement in sexual sensations and sexual satisfaction in 39 people (54%; p=0.001; Gauruder-Burmester 2008).

    Incontinence

    One study reported an incontinence outcome.

    In the prospective cohort study (n=14), at 1 month (n=14), mean incontinence episode per 24 hours decreased from 5.5 (SD 3.8) at baseline to 2.2 (SD 2.6). This change was statistically significant (p=0.001). This was maintained at 3 months (n=14), where the mean incontinence episode was 3.3 (SD 3.2; p=0.01), and 6 months (n=5), when the mean incontinence episode was 2.4 (SD 0.9; p=0.01; Schiotz 2017).

    Bladder symptoms

    In one prospective cohort study in an adult population (n=14), 3 people had improved bladder symptoms for more than 1 week, 4 people had improved bladder symptoms for less than 1 week, 4 people showed no improvement. In this study, the treatment was stopped in 3 people because of bladder contractions and leakage (Riedl 1998b).

    Safety

    Interstitial cystitis

    In a case report of 2 people, both reported signs of transient ischaemic attack within 3 and 6 hours after having EMDA (Hinkel 2004).

    In the randomised prospective study of 31 people, no SAEs were reported and no one refused the intervention because of side effects (Gulpinar 2014).

    In the single-arm cohort study of 21 females (as reported by the study), no SAEs were reported. Erythema at the abdominal skin was usually present during the procedure and resolved within a few hours. Most experienced haematuria at the end of draining the bladder (Rosamilia 1997).

    In the single-arm cohort study of 13 people, no SAEs were reported. All had skin erythema observed within hours at the abdominal electrode site. Two people showed deterioration in bladder symptoms, which occurred about 30 minutes after therapy and lasted for 1 to 4 days. The local anaesthesia was reported as incomplete in both (Riedl 1998a).

    In the single-arm cohort study of 6 people, no SAEs were reported. No one experienced pain or significant discomfort. Some people reported tingling sensation on the abdominal skin during the intervention (Gurpinar 1996).

    Overactive bladder

    No SAEs were reported in the key studies.

    In the prospective cohort study, 2 people developed abdominal skin erythema underneath electrodes and complained about pain during the second EMDA session, resulting in the treatment being stopped (Bach 2009).

    In the prospective cohort study, 12 people developed reactive hypertension during treatment, which returned to normal without any intervention. 21 people showed signs of dysuria and haematuria. Ten people experienced UTI. One person developed urinary retention, which disappeared after 2 catheterisation procedures (Gauruder-Burmester 2008).

    In the prospective cohort study, most people had transient, mild, painless abdominal skin erythema for a few hours after treatment. Three episodes of acute cystitis was reported in 2 people with prior history of recurrent UTI (Schiotz 2017).

    In the prospective cohort study, no local or systemic side effects were observed. Treatment was stopped in 3 people because of bladder contractions and leakage (Riedl 1998b).

    Anecdotal and theoretical adverse events

    Expert advice was sought from consultants who have been nominated or ratified by their professional society or royal college. They were asked if they knew of any other adverse events for this procedure that they had heard about (anecdotal), which were not reported in the literature. They were also asked if they thought there were other adverse events that might possibly occur, even if they had never happened (theoretical).Two professional expert questionnaires for this procedure were submitted. Find full details of what the professional experts said about the procedure in the specialist advice questionnaires for this procedure.

    Validity and generalisability

    Interstitial cystitis

    • All evidence is from outside the UK.

    • There are varying therapeutic agents, electric current, and treatment duration of the intervention.

    • The number of EMDA interventions per person varied between studies.

    • The maximum follow-up duration was 24 months.

    • The outcome measures assessing efficacy were varied across studies.

    • The outcome measure in assessing QOL for some studies was neither mentioned nor validated.

    • In the Rosamilia (1997) study, pain scores at 6-months were only available for 16 of the 21 subjects. There were incomplete data in 6-month urinary diary, resulting in only 7 out of 16 urinary diaries able to be analysed.

    • No randomised controlled trials comparing EMDA with oral therapy or other current standards of care were identified.

    Overactive bladder

    • All evidence is from outside UK.

    • There are varying therapeutic agents, electric current, and treatment duration of the intervention. The number of EMDA interventions per person varied between studies.

    • The outcome measure of bladder improvement was not specified in one prospective cohort study (Riedl 1998b).

    • The maximum follow-up duration is 12 months.

    • No randomised controlled trials comparing EMDA with oral therapy or other current standards of care were identified.

    Any ongoing trials

    No ongoing trials were identified for either indication.