Interventional procedure overview of electrically stimulated intravesical therapy for interstitial cystitis or overactive bladder in adults
Closed for comments This consultation ended on at Request commenting lead permission
Evidence summary
Population and studies description
Interstitial cystitis
This interventional procedures overview is based on 73 adults from 1 randomised prospective study (Gulpinar 2014), 2 cohort studies (Rosamilia 1997; Riedl 1998a), 1 single-arm trial (Gurpinar 1996), and 1 case report (Hinkel 2004). Of these 73 people, 58 had the procedure. This is a rapid review of the literature, and a flow chart of the complete selection process is shown in figure 1a. This overview presents 4 studies as the key evidence in table 2a and table 3a, and lists 2 other relevant studies in appendix B, table 5a.
The randomised prospective study was the only comparative study (Gulpinar 2014), and was done in Turkey. The other key studies are single-arm cohort studies from Australia (Rosamilia 1997), Austria (Riedl 1998a) and the US (Gurpinar 1996). One case report (Hinkel 2004) described the safety outcome only. The mean age of people with interstitial cystitis considered for efficacy outcomes was between 42 and 62 years. Most of the people who had the procedure were female, as reported by the studies. Follow up was 24 months in the randomised study (Gulpinar 2014). In the 2 cohort studies, mean follow up was 6 months (Rosamilia 1997) and 10 months (Riedl 1998a). Follow up was between 3 months and 18 months in the single-arm trial (Gurpinar 1996). Table 2a presents study details. Follow up was not reported in the case report study (Hinkel 2004).
Overactive bladder
There was evidence from 184 adults from 2 prospective cohort studies done in Germany (Bach 2009, Gauruder-Burmester 2008), 1 prospective cohort study done in Norway (Schiotz 2017) and 1 prospective cohort study done in Austria (Riedl 1998b). This is a rapid review of the literature, and a flow chart of the complete selection process is shown in figure 1b. This overview presents 4 studies as the key evidence in table 2b and table 3b and 2 other relevant studies in appendix B, table 5b.
Among the studies, the mean age of people with OAB having the procedure was between 60 and 67 years. Most of the people who had the procedure were women. One cohort study had 8 weeks follow up after the third EMDA (Bach 2009). One cohort study had 12 months follow up after the last EMDA treatment (Gauruder-Burmester 2008). One cohort study had 6 months of follow up after 1 outpatient EMDA session (Schiotz 2017). One study did not report the follow-up time (Riedl 1998b).
Procedure technique
Interstitial cystitis
Of the 5 studies, 3 single-arm cohort studies (Riedl 1998a, Rosamilia 1997, Gurpinar 1996), and 1 case report study (Hinkel 2004) named the manufacturer of the current generator device used for EMDA. The randomised prospective study did not name the generator used but mentioned the use of the 16‑Fr special catheter designed by the same manufacturer (Gulpinar 2014). The medicine solution and electric current used in EMDA varied within and between studies. The medicine solution included hyaluronic acid, lidocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline and dexamethasone, and lidocaine with adrenaline. The electric current used was between 15 mA and 60 mA. The procedure time varied between studies from 20 to 38 minutes. The number of procedures varied between studies.
Overactive bladder
Of the 4 studies, 3 studies named the same device from the same manufacturer used for EMDA (Bach 2009, Gauruder-Burmester 2008, Schiotz 2017). The medicine solution, electric current and treatment time given in EMDA varied between studies. The medicine solution included lidocaine with dexamethasone and adrenaline, botulinum toxin A in normal saline, and oxybutynin hydrochloride. The electric current used was between 15 mA and 30 mA with 20 to 30 minutes treatment time.
The number of procedures per person varied between studies. Two prospective cohort studies in an adult population did the procedure 3 times with hospital stays (Bach 2009 and Gauruder-Burmester 2008). One prospective cohort study did the procedure once in an outpatient setting (Schiotz 2017).
Efficacy
Interstitial cystitis
Frequency
Two studies reported data on voiding frequency.
In the randomised prospective study comparing the administration of hyaluronic acid via EMDA (n=16) with standard intravesical treatment (n=15), at 6 months the EMDA arm had a mean absolute change of voiding frequency per day of -7.9 (SD 0.7) compared with -5.1 (SD 0.7) in the catheter group. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.012). At 12 months, The EMDA group had a mean absolute change of -8.1 (SD 0.7) compared with -5.0 (SD 0.7) in the catheter group. This difference was also statistically significant (p=0.022). But, no statistically significant difference was observed at 1 month and 24 months follow up (Gulpinar 2014).
In a single-arm cohort study of 21 people, the mean urinary frequency per 24 hours at 2 months after EMDA was 11.1 compared with 15.5 at baseline (p=0.004). But, at 6 months follow up, the mean urinary frequency per 24 hours was 12.7 (n=7), which was not statistically significantly different (p value not reported; Rosamilia 1997).
Nocturia
The randomised prospective study of 31 people was the only study reporting data on nocturia. At 6 months, the EMDA group had a mean absolute change of nocturia per night of -2.5 (SD 0.2) compared with -1.6 (SD 0.2) in the catheter group. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.038). At 12 months, the EMDA group had a mean absolute change of -2.4 (SD 0.2) compared with -1.5 (SD 0.2) in the catheter group. This difference was also statistically significant (p=0.024). In line with the frequency outcome, no statistically significant mean difference of nocturia between hyaluronic acid through EMDA compared with a catheter was observed at 1 month and 24 months follow up (Gulpinar 2014).
Pain
Two studies reported data on pain.
In the randomised prospective study of 31 people, pain was measured using VAS. At 6 months, the EMDA group had a mean absolute change of -4.6 (SD 2.6) compared with -3.1 (SD 1.6) in the catheter group. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.013). At 12 months, The EMDA group had a mean absolute change of -4.8 (SD 2.4) compared with -3.0 (SD 1.6) in the catheter group. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.016). Similar to the frequency and nocturia, there was no statistically significant difference in pain at 1‑month and 24‑month follow up (Gulpinar 2014).
In the single-arm cohort study of 21 people, the pain was measured using a 0 to 10 scale. The median pain score before treatment was 8. The median pain scores were 3 at 2 weeks after EMDA (n=21), 4 at 2 months after EMDA (n=21), and 5 at 6 months after EMDA (n=16). The reductions in pain score in all 3 follow-up periods were statistically significant (p<0.05; Rosamilia 1997).
Treatment response
One randomised prospective cohort study compared the treatment response of hyaluronic acid administered with EMDA compared with a catheter, based on the GRA score. Treatment with EMDA was associated with higher response rates, with HR: 2.457 (95% CI 1.458 to 3.897), p=0.011.
Complete and partial response
One single-arm cohort study described a complete response as the complete resolution of urgency and bladder pain in combination with a reduction of urinary frequency for at least 1 week. A partial response was defined as the reduction of the bladder symptom for less than 1 week. A total of 8 out of 13 (62%) people had complete response, 3 (22%) experienced partial response, and 2 (16%) had deterioration of symptoms. The mean duration of symptom improvement was 4.5 months (range 0.75 to 17 months; Riedl 1998a).
Quality of Life
One single-arm cohort study reported QoL but no outcome measure was mentioned. Eight out of 13 people (62%) reported 'significant' QoL improvement (p value not reported; Riedl 1998a).
Total voiding symptom
One single-arm cohort study compared the total voiding symptom at 1 week before and 1 week after EMDA. Four out of 6 people experienced 'significant' and durable responses and 2 had temporary responses. The voiding symptom outcome measure used was developed locally (Gurpinar 1996).
Overactive bladder
Frequency
Three studies reported data on voiding frequency.
In the prospective cohort study (n=84), after 2 EMDA sessions, mean daytime frequency decreased from 14.1 (SE 7.7) per day to 9.4 (SE 6.2) per day. This change was statistically significant (p<0.0001), and was maintained at 8 weeks follow up, when the mean daytime frequency was 9.3 (SE 4.1; p<0.0001; Bach 2009).
In the prospective cohort study (n=72), there was a statistically significant decrease in voiding frequency per day from 16 to 7 (p=0.003; Gauruder-Burmester 2008).
In the prospective cohort studies of 14 people, there was a statistically significant decrease in mean voiding frequency per 24 hours from 11 (SD 2.2) at baseline to 9.2 (SD 3.2) at 1 month (p=0.023). There was no statistically significant difference at 3 months (11.1 [SD 3.3], p=0.44), or 6 months (9.4 [SD 0.9], p=0.37, n=5; Schiotz 2017).
Nocturia
Two studies reported data on nocturia.
In the prospective cohort study (n=84), after 2 EMDA sessions, nocturia per night decreased from 5.1 (SE 5.1) per night to 2.5 (SE 2.4) per night. This change was statistically significant (p=0.035). But, it then rose to 4.3 (SE 4.1) at 8 weeks follow up (p>0.1; Bach 2009).
In the prospective cohort study (n=72), there was a decrease of nocturia from 5 to 2. No statistical significance or p-value was reported. (Gauruder-Burmester 2008).
Quality of life
Two studies reported data on QoL, assessed using the validated KHQ.
In the prospective cohort study (n=84), a reduction of impact in QoL was observed from 11.8 (SE 3.2) to 7.3 (SE 4.1; p<0.018) at 4 weeks. But, at 8 weeks follow up, it rose to 10.1 (SE 3.5; p>0.1; Bach 2009).
In the prospective cohort study (n=72), an improvement in QoL was observed in 54 people (75%; p=0.002; Gauruder-Burmester 2008).
Sexual sensation and satisfaction
One prospective cohort study (n=72) reported an improvement in sexual sensations and sexual satisfaction in 39 people (54%; p=0.001; Gauruder-Burmester 2008).
Incontinence
One study reported an incontinence outcome.
In the prospective cohort study (n=14), at 1 month (n=14), mean incontinence episode per 24 hours decreased from 5.5 (SD 3.8) at baseline to 2.2 (SD 2.6). This change was statistically significant (p=0.001). This was maintained at 3 months (n=14), where the mean incontinence episode was 3.3 (SD 3.2; p=0.01), and 6 months (n=5), when the mean incontinence episode was 2.4 (SD 0.9; p=0.01; Schiotz 2017).
Bladder symptoms
In one prospective cohort study in an adult population (n=14), 3 people had improved bladder symptoms for more than 1 week, 4 people had improved bladder symptoms for less than 1 week, 4 people showed no improvement. In this study, the treatment was stopped in 3 people because of bladder contractions and leakage (Riedl 1998b).
Safety
Interstitial cystitis
In a case report of 2 people, both reported signs of transient ischaemic attack within 3 and 6 hours after having EMDA (Hinkel 2004).
In the randomised prospective study of 31 people, no SAEs were reported and no one refused the intervention because of side effects (Gulpinar 2014).
In the single-arm cohort study of 21 females (as reported by the study), no SAEs were reported. Erythema at the abdominal skin was usually present during the procedure and resolved within a few hours. Most experienced haematuria at the end of draining the bladder (Rosamilia 1997).
In the single-arm cohort study of 13 people, no SAEs were reported. All had skin erythema observed within hours at the abdominal electrode site. Two people showed deterioration in bladder symptoms, which occurred about 30 minutes after therapy and lasted for 1 to 4 days. The local anaesthesia was reported as incomplete in both (Riedl 1998a).
In the single-arm cohort study of 6 people, no SAEs were reported. No one experienced pain or significant discomfort. Some people reported tingling sensation on the abdominal skin during the intervention (Gurpinar 1996).
Overactive bladder
No SAEs were reported in the key studies.
In the prospective cohort study, 2 people developed abdominal skin erythema underneath electrodes and complained about pain during the second EMDA session, resulting in the treatment being stopped (Bach 2009).
In the prospective cohort study, 12 people developed reactive hypertension during treatment, which returned to normal without any intervention. 21 people showed signs of dysuria and haematuria. Ten people experienced UTI. One person developed urinary retention, which disappeared after 2 catheterisation procedures (Gauruder-Burmester 2008).
In the prospective cohort study, most people had transient, mild, painless abdominal skin erythema for a few hours after treatment. Three episodes of acute cystitis was reported in 2 people with prior history of recurrent UTI (Schiotz 2017).
In the prospective cohort study, no local or systemic side effects were observed. Treatment was stopped in 3 people because of bladder contractions and leakage (Riedl 1998b).
Anecdotal and theoretical adverse events
Expert advice was sought from consultants who have been nominated or ratified by their professional society or royal college. They were asked if they knew of any other adverse events for this procedure that they had heard about (anecdotal), which were not reported in the literature. They were also asked if they thought there were other adverse events that might possibly occur, even if they had never happened (theoretical).Two professional expert questionnaires for this procedure were submitted. Find full details of what the professional experts said about the procedure in the specialist advice questionnaires for this procedure.
Validity and generalisability
Interstitial cystitis
All evidence is from outside the UK.
There are varying therapeutic agents, electric current, and treatment duration of the intervention.
The number of EMDA interventions per person varied between studies.
The maximum follow-up duration was 24 months.
The outcome measures assessing efficacy were varied across studies.
The outcome measure in assessing QOL for some studies was neither mentioned nor validated.
In the Rosamilia (1997) study, pain scores at 6-months were only available for 16 of the 21 subjects. There were incomplete data in 6-month urinary diary, resulting in only 7 out of 16 urinary diaries able to be analysed.
No randomised controlled trials comparing EMDA with oral therapy or other current standards of care were identified.
Overactive bladder
All evidence is from outside UK.
There are varying therapeutic agents, electric current, and treatment duration of the intervention. The number of EMDA interventions per person varied between studies.
The outcome measure of bladder improvement was not specified in one prospective cohort study (Riedl 1998b).
The maximum follow-up duration is 12 months.
No randomised controlled trials comparing EMDA with oral therapy or other current standards of care were identified.
Any ongoing trials
No ongoing trials were identified for either indication.
How are you taking part in this consultation?
You will not be able to change how you comment later.
You must be signed in to answer questions